Jaramillo Representative Cases

• Lusardi, et al. v. Ben Myerson Candy Co., Inc. dba Wine Warehouse, American Arbitration Association Case No. 72 160 00669 11 (represent claimants with co-counsel HammondLaw, PC in putative class arbitration alleging failure to fully reimburse motor vehicle expenses incurred by Wine Warehouse Chain Sales Representatives and Broad Market Sales Representatives and misclassification of Chain Sales Representatives as exempt from California's overtime and meal period requirements).

• Willner v. Manpower, Inc., Case No. 3:11-cv-02846 JSW (N.D. Cal.) (represent plaintiff with co-counsel Jackson Hanson, LLP in putative class action on behalf of temporary employees claiming late payment of wages and inadequate wage statements).

• Smith, et al. v. The Cheesecake Factory Restaurants, Inc., Case No. 3:06-cv-8029 (M.D. Tenn.) (represent claimants with co-counsel Yezbak Law Offices in collective action arbitrations on behalf of current and former servers alleging that The Cheesecake Factory violated the federal minimum wage and overtime laws by requiring them to purchase uniforms and other work items and to work "off-the-clock" without pay for certain pre-shift and post-shift time periods).

• Casas v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T California, No. CGC-11-512187 (S.F. Superior Court) (represent plaintiffs with co-counsel GrahamHollis APC in putative class action alleging misclassification and unpaid overtime compensation, unreimbursed business expenses, and failure to explain incentive pay formula under California law for Winback Account Executives and Business Integrated Solutions Account Managers).

• Ellis v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T California, No. 11-00627 CJC (FFMx) (C.D. Cal.) (represent plaintiffs with co-counsel GrahamHollis APC in putative class action alleging misclassification and unpaid overtime compensation under California law for service executives); motion for remand granted at 2011 WL 499390 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2011).

• Mahoney v. AT&T Corp., et al., No. BC385361 (L.A. Cty. Super. Ct.) (represented plaintiffs with co-counsel GrahamHollis APC in putative class action alleging misclassification and unpaid overtime compensation under California law for account managers, service managers, and projects managers)

• Cruz, et al. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, et al., No. C01-00892 CRB (N.D. Cal.) (settlement on behalf of class of World War II era braceros for return of "savings fund" wages)

• Tucker, et al.  v. Walgreen Company, No.  05-cv-440-GPM (S.D. Ill.) (settlement of discrimination class action on behalf of African American store and pharmacy employees)

• Gabriel, et al., v. Verizon Communications, Inc., et al., No. 04 CC 00591 (Orange Cty. Super. Ct.) (settlement of unlawful deductions class action on behalf of phone book sales employees)

• Sutter Health Uninsured Pricing Cases, No. JC4388 (Sacramento Cty. Super. Ct.) (settlement on behalf of class of uninsured patients for health care overcharging)

• De Soto v. Sears Roebuck & Co., No. RG 03096692 (Alameda Cty. Super. Ct.) (settlement of certified California wage and hour class action on behalf of home repair technicians, along with companion FLSA collective action; settlement affirmed on appeal by the Third Circuit, Lenahan v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 266 Fed. Appx. 114 (3d Cir. 2008))

• Dunwiddie, et al. v. Central Locating Service, No. 5:04-CV-315-OC-106 (M.D. Fla.) (settlement of FLSA collective action for overtime pay on behalf of utility locators)

• Pakeman, et al. v. American Honda Finance Corp., RG 03088926 (Alameda Cty. Super. Ct.) (settlement of lending discrimination claims on behalf of class of African American and Latino borrowers)

• Angione v. PSS World Medical, Inc., No. 3:02-cv-854-J-25TEM (M.D. Fla.) (settlement of FLSA collective action for overtime pay on behalf of medical supply employees)

• Ramirez, et al. v. Labor Ready, No. 836186-2 (Alameda Cty. Super. Ct.) (settlement of California wage and hour class action on behalf of temporary day laborers)

• Gentry v. Superior Court, 42 Cal.4th 443 (2007) (counsel for amici curiae in case involving the enforceability of class action waivers)